Saturday, October 15, 2011

American Exceptionalism

“Exceptionalism” is the belief that something is exceptional in relation to all else of the same kind. Thus “American Exceptionalism” is the view that America is exceptional relative to the rest of the world. But exceptional in what respect?

Our founding principles made us unique and exceptional. “Individual rights” extended morality into the social system and limited the power of the State; they became an individual’s protection against the force of the collective. “The most profoundly revolutionary achievement of the U.S. was the subordination of society to moral law” (Ayn Rand). We became the first truly moral society.

For the first time, man’s life, property, freedom and pursuit of happiness were his rights by moral principle and by his nature. He was treated as an end in himself, not as the means to the ends of others or society. Capitalism, individualism and more specifically the American industrialist were born. The result was unprecedented wealth creation with an increased standard of living for all, and an enhanced value for life manifested by unprecedented charitableness.

Unfortunately, the lack of a complete philosophical foundation for capitalism has enabled the latter to be seriously compromised over time - e.g. by an altruist/collectivist ethics. And there is a high correlation between the level of adherence to capitalist principles and the level of our exceptionalism.

Until recently, such compromise has resulted from a lack of understand and/or acceptance of our founding principles. But now we are dealing with our first truly anti-exceptional, explicitly anti-exceptionalism President. Obama has antipathy for what made this country great; he chooses to trade greatness for mediocrity. Why?

His explicit statist ideology trumps all. His principles are anti-American. E.g. his domestic policies prevent economic recovery; his foreign policy of “leading from behind” is despicable and dangerous, as is his self-effacement when used to offset the image of American superiority.

He duped the American public with his message of “hope and change”: he was merely “hoping” for us to ignore his long-term associations with, and acceptance of the beliefs of, the most radical statists in the country; and his “change” was always intended to mean a strong movement toward statism and to immorally redistribute wealth. He sacrifices truth for lies to protect his secrets - his ideology, racism, multiculturalism, crony-socialism and general ineptitude. To him, the decline of American values is simply a rebalancing of American and non-American values; American exceptionalism is considered immoral; individual initiative and responsibility are to be replaced with collective values.

I am tired of hearing about the failure of capitalism which no longer truly exists; about corporate greed when greed is primarily associated with statists (no, the likes of Ebenezer Scrooge are not capitalists); about a “social contract” of sacrifice when the only existing “contract” is to protect individual rights; and about class warfare, only existent under statism (e.g. Obama uses racism, sexism, wealth envy and economic/environmental myths to divide us). Get Obama out of the White House and we might have a chance to regain our exceptionalism.


(To comment, cllick on an article title on top or in the Blog Archive below, and then select "Name" Profile - enter first and/or last name only.)

5 comments:

  1. crony-socialism...good one

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unfortunately, Carol views AE as merely a fashionable Republican phrase; and she focuses on past American shortcomings to refute my and many others' notion of AE. Perhaps this explains the fundamental problem with the OWS protestors: they don't see the irrationality of their opposition to AE and capitalism. If they all supported corporations' success, they would likely have jobs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. John McLaughlin's 10/21 TWI article was a very good extension of what I was saying here. His conclusion that "the other author reveals the mindset willing to let (Obama's statism) happen" is indeed the greatest concern: that is the failure to understand the moral foundation for capitalism that I discussed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pat Fitzhenry (11/4) believed that John explained my position on American Exceptionalism as “failed.” She must not have read either my or John’s article well because John fully echoed my position. We both focused on our founding principles that made our system exceptional; he expounded more on our form of government that followed from those principles. I then discussed the moral foundation required to sustain our capitalist system and how the lack of its understanding and adherence has led to the fall of our exceptionalism. John’s conclusion points to the failure to truly understand that foundation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Can I please take a shot at "American Exceptionalism"?

    Science tells us that nothing profound separates the DNA of American citizens from that of any other humans in recent history or geography. Yet, within the span of a little over 200 years the people of America (originally immigrating from all over the planet) have thoroughly dominated the arts, sciences, economics, industrial development and cultural aspects of the world as no other group of people in all human history.

    It has rarely been pretty--filled with an ugly history of slavery, political conflict, corruption, crime, discrimination and other human failings which have plagued nearly all societies since the dawn of human history. So then, why this exceptional dominance?

    Obviously America has been able to control a large land mass rich in natural raw materials to create wealth. That helps but is not unique (think of China, Russia, Canada and Brazil, for example).

    What's truly different is that of all political systems in world history only Armerica was founded as a republic of sovereign states united by a ccnstitution that began with the words "we the people" and established a government to ensure certan rights to its citizens granted by their Creator--not by other persons.

    The original Constitution contained numerous flaws--most of which were corrected over the next 200 years (and not without bloodshed.) However, the most grievous were corrected with the first 10 amendments adopted before formal ratification occurred.

    Those 10 were specifically intended to forever limit the power of the federal government and to reserve to the individual states or the people any power not expressly granted to the central government. If citizens did not approve what was happening in their state, they could "vote with their feet."

    Thus, I submit "American Exceptionalism" has resulted from liberty made possible by limited centralized governrnent.

    Individuals--millions of them--unshackled by an overarching government will do what is best for themselves and their families. Their ingenuity, entrepreneurship and hard labor will accomplish benefits not only for themselves but for society as a whole--results not producible by any government bureaucracy.

    Make no mistake, government must exist to maintain order, protect society from foreign and domestic threats and administer justice--including preserving individual rights. However, liberty--freedom of action (including the freedom make bad decisions) without government control to the greatest extent possible--will keep this nation exceptional.

    The two authors in the recent TWI dialogue clearly show where the dangers to our continued exceptionalism lay. One author reveals how Barack Obama leads an effort to grow centralized control to pull America down. The other author reveals the mindset willing to let that happen.

    John McLaughlin, Forest Park Circle

    ReplyDelete